Method

Rules first, then wider use

Standards first

Written rules before any tool is used

AI must not invent data, confidence is stated, people check every output, client data stays out of public services, and AI-written code is reviewed before use. Wider use comes second.

rules firstclient data protected

Division of work

AI drafts, the engineer decides and signs

AI produces first drafts and repeated checks; the engineer reviews, decides and signs. In my group I specify the requirements, review the code and accept the results; implementation is by the team and AI coding agents.

human reviewengineer signs

Audit trail

Evidence that a result can be trusted

On safety-critical assets, a model is worth as much as the evidence that it can be trusted. We build that in: independent re-computation, signed audit ledgers, benchmark audits, and written records of tests that have not yet passed. Contractual targets are kept apart from achieved results.

independent re-computationfailures recorded

Start small

Agree the decision, then pilot on one work package

Scope starts from the decision the work must support. Acceptance, data ownership and whether any AI tool may see client data are written down before work begins. I would then test the approach on one work package before wider use, and hand over methods and standards so the client can continue alone.

acceptance agreed firstone work package

Record

Commissions where the methods were used

Client names withheld. Roles as written in the contracts.

Automated compliance checking, 2024

Code clauses turned into machine-checkable rules

Won in open competition, with me as project lead: rule-base research for automated compliance checking of building models, for a large infrastructure operator. Accepted after the client's expert review in December 2024.

won by open tenderaccepted

Ageing assets, 2025–2027

AI-assisted assessment of ageing steel structures

Principal investigator on three successive commissioned research contracts on how ageing steel lattice structures fail under extreme wind and how to assess, strengthen and repair them. I lead a multidisciplinary team, including full professors, building digital-twin prototypes and AI surrogate models.

principal investigatorrepeat commissions

Digital transformation advisory, 2023–2024

Advice to an airport operator

Co-lead of the consultancy team, in the bid and in delivery, for a six-month advisory on digital transformation and BIM-based digital delivery, with an external standards expert as lead.

co-leadwon in competition

Information standards to repeat business, 2022–2025

From a BIM guideline to a returning client

For a commercial developer I led a BIM implementation guideline on information standards, quality checklists and data sharing, then, as principal investigator, a tendered façade quality assessment cross-checked by two independent algorithms, delivered and accepted. In 2025–26 the developer group commissioned further work through the testing organisation it had appointed.

data governancerepeat client

Prototypes

What my group has built

Research prototypes and demonstrations, not systems in client use.

Assurance prototype, 2026

An independent chain that re-checks the main one

Re-computes analysis results through an independent chain and keeps a signed audit ledger. It has caught a real error in the main chain: a load counted twice in a load combination.

prototypesigned audit ledger

Working demonstration

A working demonstration on open data

FacilityNexus, on the Lab page: a 3-D digital-twin view of a building with an operations assistant, running on open datasets (CC BY 4.0) for invited testers.

open datasets onlysee Lab page

Published

Papers where the methods can be checked

Corresponding author of seven journal papers published in 2026; these are the closest to AI practice.

Buildings, 2026

Human-in-the-loop rule-base generation for automated BIM compliance checking

A language model drafts candidate rules from a knowledge graph; low-confidence rules go to expert review. Corresponding author. doi:10.3390/buildings16040719

knowledge graphhuman in the loop

Applied Sciences, 2026

Near-duplicate contamination in a safety-helmet detection benchmark

An audit of a widely used benchmark, with a duplicate-aware evaluation split. Final and corresponding author. doi:10.3390/app162010430

benchmark integrityevaluation

Buildings, 2026

Image-based corrosion assessment with probabilistic reliability

Corrosion grading from images, linked to reliability analysis of ageing steel lattice structures. Corresponding author. doi:10.3390/buildings16112250

computer visionreliability

Applied Sciences, 2026

An auditable wind-and-terrain-to-finite-element workflow

Explicit gates for source time, spatial extent and solver balance, so each input can be traced. Corresponding author. doi:10.3390/app16199420

auditable workflowtraceable inputs

Applied Sciences, 2026

Risk-based safety assessment of ageing lattice steel structures under extreme winds

Multi-scale wind coupled with several forms of degradation. Corresponding author. doi:10.3390/app16136788

risk assessmentageing structures

Buildings, 2024

Improved safety-helmet detection (YOLOv8s-SNC)

A modified detection network for helmet wearing on construction sites. First author. doi:10.3390/buildings14123883

computer visionsite safety

Working with me

For clients and employers

AI assurance

AI readiness and assurance review

Where AI can be trusted in an asset decision and what evidence it needs, including dataset and benchmark integrity audits and independent verification of AI-assisted engineering results.

assuranceindependent verification

Data

Data maturity and governance for asset owners

A data maturity assessment, a digital capability review and a data governance framework: who owns what is produced, how confidential material is handled, and what AI may see.

data governanceinformation standards

Teams

AI adoption in engineering teams

Written rules first and wider use second, so the team's practice improves without risking client data.

rules firstteam adoption

Capability building

Building the capability, not only the project

As Founding Dean of the Smart City and Sustainable Development Academy (SCSDA), I built an applied research and advisory institute from nothing, with 12 research centres and laboratories built with partners, four overseas, and signed its client contracts as legal representative.

institution buildingclient contracts
My work links these pieces into one route: measured data, a model that can be checked, AI that drafts, and an engineer who signs. Client identities, contract terms and project data are not published here; supporting documents are available on request.